Thursday 18 December 2014

Taxed O2 in 2050

Taxed O2 2050:  When Rural People will get paid for their love to Nature.

2014 is going to end, civilization and industrialization has new heights, and people still are running blindly towards the technology and development with avoiding the hand of the nature and missing the reality of prediction. Increased industrialization and growing population influences the increased rates of urbanization, which is leading to decrease in natural vegetation and preparing a way to enhance artificial vegetation and genetically modified trees, in turns of flowering, coconut tree, some bushes, and even the large trees.
The loss of natural vegetation and playing with nature it is very important question to think that where it would lead us?  Think about it, the speed at which civilization is growing, it becoming guilty at the same speed to be responsible to modify it earth’s ecosystem. Well on the other hand if we are continuing the same till 2050, I can imagine the scenario when there will be shortage of O2 and government will be bounded to apply tax on the O2 consumption, imagine that fact…. Number of family members will multiply the taxes, and the number of green vegetation infront of their homes will be counted to deduct the tax amount. Can you imagine the fact that it would be a dramatic change, when poor farmers and rural families will be getting paid for maintaining their surrounding full of green vegetation and will get an O2 tax relaxation? See that there will be decline of current prestige civilization which has a poor heart for rural people and their living standard, although they need to be grow, yes its necessity but not in exchange of their rural extant and their moral values. Rural people if failed to stand at the same place at where current middle class and upper middle class people are, then it’s not a concern to worry one day they will have to pay for their simplicity and love for nature. Wait till the 2050, when their ambitions will lead them at this stage, “Taxed O2

A thought of my fiend Abhishek Pundir, and documented in my way….. Hope it will be liked from you.

Monday 15 December 2014

Moisture Variation In Soils

Moisture Variation In Soils: In Relation to Surface Albedo

Studies in the past illustrated the effect of soil moisture content over the surface albedo, which are inversely related, i.e., surface albedo decreased with increasing surface soil moisture content. Among them, Idso (1975) found surface albedo to be a linear function of soil moisture content at the very thin surface layer (0–2 cm), and surface albedo corresponded slightly to the soil moisture of more than 2 cm depths. Additionally, he pointed out that the variation of bare soil surface albedo with time was symmetrical about local noon when the soil was rather wet (volumetric soil moisture content >0.20V V-1) and rather dry (volumetric soil moisture content <0.04V V-1). Another study measured the soil moisture of 0–2 cm at the soil surface, and found that the soil moisture content was less than 0.0075 g g-1 in dune sand with soil bulk density of 1.665 g /cm-3 and BSCs with soil bulk density of 1.386 g cm-3. The surface albedos exhibited random variations with increasing soil moisture content and no significant relationship was found between surface albedo and soil moisture content when the soil moisture content was less than 0.0075 g g-1. Gu et al. (2001) assumed that the surface was in dry conditions when the surface soil moisture was less than 0.005 g g-1 and Idso (1975) proposed a volumetric soil moisture content of less than 0.04V V-1.We consider the surfaces as dry and soil moisture has little influence on surface albedo when soil moisture is less than 0.0075 g g-1. Thus, by reviewing the control factors on surface albedo, it is assumed that surface albedo is predominantly controlled by solar zenith angle for the two bare and dry surfaces.

Friday 5 December 2014

Aerosols: A perception Regarding to Climate change

As we all know about aerosols, let me first start with the question that what are these particles? Do they have direct effect on climate change? Or they indirectly affect it?

Here we go; Aerosols are the tiniest particles which remains suspended in the atmosphere, most specifically in the lower atmosphere or troposphere. Different specialists describe the particles based on shape, size, and chemical composition.
Climatologists typically use another set of labels that speak to the chemical composition. Key aerosol groups include sulfates, organic carbon, black carbon, nitrates, mineral dust, and sea salt. In practice, many of these terms are imperfect, as aerosols often clump together to form complex mixtures. It’s common, for example, for particles of black carbon from soot or smoke to mix with nitrates and sulfates, or to coat the surfaces of dust, creating hybrid particles (1).

These particles keep moving in atmosphere and interact with atmosphere in two ways; directly and indirectly. Direct interaction with atmosphere leads to generate the blue sky, and another colors in different events, like reddish and yellowish color at the time of sunset and sunrise, we all know that this is due to scattering of incoming sun's radiation in atmosphere. In true words these aerosols are capable of reflecting back the sun's radiation in a large extent which leads to decrease in the temperature or truly speaking retards to enter it into the our atmosphere. Whatever we talked about was only the thing which can observe with our senses, and we technically admire it. But the indirect interaction is quit complex phenomena, hard to understand, but it's true too, that aerosols affects the formation of clouds in lower atmosphere. The amount of aerosol present in lower atmosphere, modifies the reflectivity of clouds to sun light, also changes the size of cloud in lower atmosphere.
Aerosol Interaction with cloud and ozone deterioration


Aerosols are also responsible for deterioration of stratospheric ozone, which is due to its chemically reactive property. How this happens it’s a complex chemistry, what we can understand is that it chemically react with the atmospheric water which may be available as water vapor, this leads to formation of chemically active clouds which generates the highly active chlorine which react with the ozone. Well this is a complex thing. Another thing is to notice that what are the other impacts of aerosols? Aerosol may cause acid rain due to the presence of chemically active particles which forms acids; these may be SO2 or HCL which is generally erupted by volcanic movements. These aerosols when comes in contact with water, rains as acid rain mainly in the form of hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid.

Now question rises that where from these aerosols come, actually aerosols are the part of our nature hence the atmosphere too. Nature itself carries these particles in suspension, but some of the aerosols are added to our atmosphere by man's activities.
The main sources of aerosols are:
1. Desert Dust
2. Volcanic Eruption added
3. Man Made
As i mentioned above that nature itself carry the aerosols, about 90% of by mass of aerosols are naturally originated and added to the atmosphere. Volcanic eruption is the one of the major natural phenomena which introduces huge amount of ash into air, SO2 and other gases which yields sulfates. Naturally occurring forest fires, introduces lot of organic carbon. Some plants produce gases that react with other substances in the air to yield aerosols, such as 'smoke' in the Great Smoky Mountains of United States. Likewise in the ocean, some types of micro-algae produces a sulfurous gas called dimethyl sulfide that can be converted into sulfates in the atmosphere(1). Sea salts which vaporized with water, most abundant aerosols. Sand particles are also present in huge amount added by the high speed winds.
Rest amount of aerosols are considered to be added by anthropogenic activities, having a great variety. Mainly these are added by the industrial activities, due to fossil fuel combustion which induces large amount of sulfur-di-oxide. Other activities like consuming farm waste, preparation of farm land yields smoke, which is a source of organic carbon.
Automobiles incinerators, smelters, and power plants are prolific producers of sulfates, nitrates, black carbon and other particles. Deforestation overgrazing drought and excessive irrigation can alter the land surface, increasing the rate at which dust aerosols enter the atmosphere. Even indoors, cigarettes, cooking stoves, fireplaces, and candles are source of aerosols.

Aerosols and sunlight:
Different type of aerosols scatters or absorbs sunlight in different proportions, depending upon the physical properties (shape, size etc.). It is a direct effect of aerosols, which directly deal with earth’s radiative field. Mostly aerosols reflect back the sunlight depending upon their color and composition, but some darker aerosols absorb it too.
Pure sulfates and nitrates reflect nearly all radiation they encounter, cooling the atmosphere. Black carbon, in contrast, absorbs radiation readily, warming the atmosphere but also shading the surface. Organic carbon, sometimes called brown carbon or organic matter, has a warming influence on the atmosphere depending on the brightness of the underlying ground. Dust impacts radiation to varying degrees, depending on the composition of the minerals that comprise the dust grains, and whether they are coated with black or brown carbon. Salt particles tend to reflect all the sunlight they encounter (1).
If amount of aerosols suddenly increased in the atmosphere; than it cause sudden cooling effect. Aerosols, particularly black carbon, can alter reflectivity by depositing a layer of dark residue on ice and other bright surfaces. In the Arctic especially, aerosols from wildfires and industrial pollution are likely hastening the melting of ice.
Scientists believe the cooling from sulfates and other reflective aerosols overwhelms the warming effect of black carbon and other absorbing aerosols over the planet. Models estimate that aerosols have had a cooling effect that has counteracted about half of the warming caused by the build-up of greenhouse gases since the 1880s. However, unlike many greenhouse gases, aerosols are not distributed evenly around the planet, so their impacts are most strongly felt on a regional scale.

Aerosols and clouds:
Aerosols play a critical role in the process of cloud formation. In fact, most clouds formed due to the presence of aerosols which serves as the tiny “seeds,” called cloud condensation nuclei.

Natural aerosols—often sulfates, sea salt or ammonium salts—are the most common condensation nuclei in pristine environments. Polluted air, in contrast, usually contains much higher concentrations of water-soluble particles, which means pollution-rich clouds tend to have more numerous, but smaller, droplets. The small droplets make polluted clouds look brighter than they would otherwise be. Just as many bits of crushed ice give light more surfaces to reflect off—appearing brighter than a solid cube of ice—if the water in a cloud is divided into a larger number of smaller droplets, it will scatter more light and become more reflective(1).

Brighter clouds, in turn, block sunlight from reaching Earth’s surface, shading the planet and producing net cooling. This cloud brightening effect—called the “cloud albedo effect”—may have a big impact on the climate, though only in recent years has it been possible to start quantifying the effect.
This impact of aerosols is clearly visible in ship tracks, bright streaks in marine clouds that look like airplane contrails. In the absence of ships, sea salt particles and the natural sulfates produced by phytoplankton seed most marine clouds. However, the exhaust from ship smokestacks make trails of sulfates and other aerosols that form long, bright clouds.

Concluding part of this text is that presence of aerosols in lesser of higher amount, modifies the  climatic changes over an region.